- From: Edi Vorauer <edmund.vorauer@altova.com>
- Date: 16 Oct 2003 11:21:37 +0200
- To: <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A949EFD2E1E88F4DA24B6D3D0328C16A5CB117@morpheus.vie.altova.com>
in '3.4.7 Built-in Complex Type Definition' xmlschema-1 specifies the
{prohibited substitutions} property for anyType as 'The empty set';
in the current XMLSchema.xsd the blockDefault attribute for
the schema element has the value '#all'; the complex type
definition for anyType does not have a block attribute, hence
the actual value of the blockDefault attribute of the schema
element applies;
is it ok to add an empty block="" attribute to the complex
type definition of anyType ?
best regards,
--
edi
... Edmund Vorauer
... Software Engineer
... Altova GmbH - markup your mind!
===================================================================
xmlspy® 2004 - mapforce(tm) 2004 - authentic(tm) 2004 - stylevision(tm) 2004
Award-winning tools for developers - web designers - business-users
NEW: XML-to-XML and DB-to-XML Mapping, XML Differencing, XPath 2.0,
Microsoft Visual Studio® .NET Integration, Borland C# Builder, Mono
Auto-Calculation, Business Logic Validation, Rich Input Formatting
Visit www.altova.com to download your free evaluation copy today!
===================================================================
The information transmitted in this message and/or as an attachment
to it is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons
or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from any computer. Altova GmbH and Altova, Inc. do not
accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any
views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do
not necessarily represent those of Altova GmbH and Altova, Inc.
unless otherwise specifically stated. Thank you!
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2003 05:23:14 UTC