W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Annotation allowed on XML representation of attribute use (Possible erratum? )

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:01:24 +0100
To: Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: David Fallside <fallside@us.ibm.com>, Dung K Nguyen <dknguyen@us.ibm.com>, lmartin@ca.ibm.com, sandygao@ca.ibm.com, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5boewsm7bv.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> writes:

> Is there draft text floating around anywhere?

Yes, Mary and I drafted it some time back:

  Here's a proposal for addressing RQ-14, RQ-19, RQ-130 and RQ-131:

    1) All components have an {annotations} property;
    2) It contains a sequence of annotations;
    3) Namely all annotations "scoped" by this component, but not "scoped"
       by any other component "further down".
    4) The order of annotations within {annotations} is
    5) There is no schema-generic way to tell what parts of a
       component/what elements in a schema document a given annotation in
       an {annotations} applies to.

This is in some minutes somewhere, I believe, but I can't immediately
locate where.

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 05:01:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:09:01 UTC