Re: Annotation allowed on XML representation of attribute use (Possible erratum? )

Noah Mendelsohn <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com> writes:

> Is there draft text floating around anywhere?

Yes, Mary and I drafted it some time back:

  Here's a proposal for addressing RQ-14, RQ-19, RQ-130 and RQ-131:

    1) All components have an {annotations} property;
    2) It contains a sequence of annotations;
    3) Namely all annotations "scoped" by this component, but not "scoped"
       by any other component "further down".
    4) The order of annotations within {annotations} is
       implementation-determined.
    5) There is no schema-generic way to tell what parts of a
       component/what elements in a schema document a given annotation in
       an {annotations} applies to.

This is in some minutes somewhere, I believe, but I can't immediately
locate where.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]