- From: Jerry <jmdris@charter.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 06:37:20 -0700
- To: W3C XML Schema Comments list <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
I have been a computer programmer for over 30 years. I am now studying web design and XML, DTD's, namespaces and Schemas. My first impression of this is gobblede gook. The terms used are a bunch of mumble jumble. If you really want this to be accepted, the FIRST thing to do is simplify names in common English. Do not attempt to constantly come up with new words to define terms. I can tell you that if I had a choice of using this or something which is defined in ordinary English words, I would dump XML in a heartbeat. This is not only my opinion but others in our class. Most are very bright people who do not come from a computer background and this is overwhelming to most of them. Over the years, computer software has evolved so that operating systems are overly complex and unreliable, as well as applications software. Now it would seem that the languages have also evolved so that they are overly complex as well. There used to be an acronym KISS, which stood for keep it simple stupid. That credo has fallen to the wayside. In an attempt to build diversification, software and languages have grown to unwielding giants. You need larger and larger manuals to keep track of all the syntax and possible variations. It won't be long before computers will be required to program computers to save us from ourselves. Otherwise, it it will require too many man hours to maintain software that no one can understand except a few. Jerry Driscoll
Received on Friday, 15 November 2002 09:58:45 UTC