W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: PSVI: {document} property

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
Date: 05 Sep 2002 11:19:24 +0100
To: "Biron,Paul V" <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org>
Cc: "'Elena Litani'" <elitani@ca.ibm.com>, www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <f5bsn0opwlv.fsf@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>

"Biron,Paul V" <Paul.V.Biron@kp.org> writes:

> What makes you think that the [schema documents] property is any
> more "required" than [schema components]?  The REC says that [schema
> documents] can be empty as well:
> 	A (possibly empty) set of schema document information items,
> 	with properties and values as follows, for each schema document
> 	which contributed components to the schema, and whose targetNamespace
> 	matches the sibling [schema namespace] property above (or whose
> 	targetNamespace was ·absent· but that contributed components to
> 	that namespace by being <include>d by a schema document with
> 	that targetNamespace as per Assembling a schema for a single
> 	target namespace from multiple schema definition documents (§4.2.1)).

I read that as saying it's only empty if there were no documents, not
that you can choose not to fill it in.

  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Received on Thursday, 5 September 2002 06:19:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:59 UTC