- From: David Stephenson <david_stephenson@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 18:36:01 -0700
- To: W3C XML Schema Comments list <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 13:34:59 UTC
Hi
there are some inconsistencies between the xml schema schema and the
english specification (which rules?) that should be cleaned up.
Specifically the english specification parts ommit annotations where
they are permitted in the schema schema. Two examples are:
attributes uses
<http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#AU_details>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#AU_details
and
element in
<http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#declare-element>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#declare-element
for the last three cases Particle*2 & , Elemnt Decl.
more generally we should ensure the spec allows annotations where the
schema schema allows them (i.e in most places).
is this a bug in the current spec or were annotations ment to be illegal in
these places?
Cheers
David
----------
1e2865.jpg
David Stephenson
Web Services
HPMD
Hewlett-Packard
Phone:++1-408 3436141
Fax: ++1-408 3436777
Telnet 343-6141
<mailto:david_stephenson@hp.com>david_stephenson@hp.com
----------
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 13:34:59 UTC