- From: David Stephenson <david_stephenson@hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 18:36:01 -0700
- To: W3C XML Schema Comments list <www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 13:34:59 UTC
Hi there are some inconsistencies between the xml schema schema and the english specification (which rules?) that should be cleaned up. Specifically the english specification parts ommit annotations where they are permitted in the schema schema. Two examples are: attributes uses <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#AU_details>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#AU_details and element in <http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#declare-element>http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#declare-element for the last three cases Particle*2 & , Elemnt Decl. more generally we should ensure the spec allows annotations where the schema schema allows them (i.e in most places). is this a bug in the current spec or were annotations ment to be illegal in these places? Cheers David ---------- 1e2865.jpg David Stephenson Web Services HPMD Hewlett-Packard Phone:++1-408 3436141 Fax: ++1-408 3436777 Telnet 343-6141 <mailto:david_stephenson@hp.com>david_stephenson@hp.com ----------
Received on Wednesday, 15 May 2002 13:34:59 UTC