- From: Bob Schloss <rschloss@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 13:46:57 -0400
- To: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson), www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
I confused two questions I wanted to ask. (Not a good idea to write e-mail while on a teleconference).... Question 1: Is it syntatically legal to specify some of the constraining facets in a nested simpleType definition (under <restriction>) and other constraining facets outside that nested simpleType definition but as child elements of <restriction>? What is the algorithm for deciding which constraining facet element information items would be permitted in that second section? (This is the question implied by Peter's original question to me). Question 2: Can a simpleType of anySimpleType be implied in a user schema? If so, can any facet element information items be used to constrain it? Thanks, Bob ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) on 10/17/2001 12:43:38 PM To: Bob Schloss/Watson/IBM@IBMUS cc: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org Subject: Re: Are facets permitted on for anySimpleType - Structure 3.14 should say; Primer Appendix B should say; Datatypes 4.3 might say I can't see how this subject derives from the question. How does anySimpleType get in here? If there's no 'base', there must be a nested <simpleType> . . . ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2001 13:48:01 UTC