Re: XML Schema - RDF Schema integration

Hans Teijgeler <Hans.Teijgeler@inter.nl.net> writes:

> Dear Sirs,
> 
> I am trying to find my way through the myriad of XML-related draft,
> proposed, candidate, and actual W3G recommendations. This is close to
> finding your way in London as a total stranger without having a map (is
> there any for the XML World?)
> 
> I have a particular question to you:
> What happened after the 'Cambridge Communique of Oct. 1999
> (http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/NOTE-schema-arch-19991007)?
> 
> Neither in XML Schema Part 1 nor in Part 2 I can find anything done
> with the request to modify XML Schema as if RDF Schema were part of
> the same XML family. In Part 2 RDF is only mentioned as a
> non-normative reference.

I'm slightly lost as to what you think is missing from XML Schema wrt
the Cambridge Communique.  All the extension facilities recommended
there were included in XML Schema. . .

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
          W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/

Received on Monday, 7 May 2001 07:58:00 UTC