- From: Max Froumentin <mf@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 13:36:14 +0100
- To: Massimo Marchiori <massimo@w3.org>
- Cc: Michael.Kay@softwareag.com, davidc@nag.co.uk, www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
Massimo Marchiori <massimo@w3.org> writes: > Therefore, no discussion should happen on www-xml-query-comments, and > the "spam-free" list for discussion has always been there: www-ql. Separating Comments and Discussion is hard to achieve, and requires a lot of work from the moderator telling people off. And I tend to find having both on the same list a good thing. I dare say that xsl-editors and xpath-comments currently work well, with no spam (at least for you guys ;), a reasonable amount of traffic, and not too many off-topic posts (most of which I receive for moderation and I personally deal with). > Incidentally, let me remark the anomaly of www-xpath-comments here Again, neither xsl-editors or www-xpath-comments are closed to non-subscribers. Their messages just happen to be moderated by me. Max.
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2002 07:36:39 UTC