- From: Dare Obasanjo <kpako@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 09:23:38 -0800
- To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>, <www-xml-query-comments@w3.org>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@softwareag.com>
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Robie" <jonathan.robie@softwareag.com> To: "Champion, Mike" <Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com>; <www-xml-query-comments@w3.org>; <xml-dev@lists.xml.org> Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:45 PM Subject: RE: [xml-dev] The use of XML syntax in XML Query > > 1. An XQuery 1.0 CR this summer, with a separate CR for updates six months > later, > or > 2. An XQuery 1.0 CR a year from now including updates. Without updates XQuery is somewhat to the database folks and will require them to retool their applications in a year to support updates anyway (planned obsolecense) or continue with their proprietary update mechanisms to please their customers.Without updates XQuery is a glorified of XSLT-- or XPath++ depending on how you want to look at it instead of the XML Data Manipulation Language it has the potential to be. > This is really the crucial question. Personally, I do not think that > waiting a year or two for updates would be a good option. If there are already proposals AND implementations for updates floating around why would it take a year to reconcile updates with the XQuery spec? -- THINGS TO DO IF I BECOME AN EVIL OVERLORD #35 I will not grow a goatee. In the old days they made you look diabolic. Now they just make you look like a disaffected member of Generation X. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2002 21:24:37 UTC