- From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@rpbourret.com>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 23:23:02 -0800
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- CC: www-xml-query-comments@w3.org
Jonathan Robie wrote: > I am all ears on this. Personally, I would think it would be particularly > interesting to hear feelings about: > > 1. An XQuery 1.0 CR this summer, with a separate CR for updates six months > later, > or > 2. An XQuery 1.0 CR a year from now including updates. > > This is really the crucial question. Personally, I do not think that > waiting a year or two for updates would be a good option. I would much rather see XQuery without updates sooner than XQuery with updates later. I can't see how it's a bad thing. It gives people something to start implementing and using now, so by the time updates come along, people are ready. Furthermore, there is a nice logical separation between reading data and manipulating data, so updates are a good feature to put in a separate release. There is some risk they will require changes to basic syntax/underlying formalisms, but the fact that people are already working on update languages will (hopefully) minimize this risk. I would also say that we've been down this path before. DOM shipped with less than "complete" functionality through its various levels and hasn't exactly had people screaming in pain. (Some discomfort, yes, but severe pain, no.) On the other hand, XML Schemas waited until several models of kitchen sinks were added and didn't exactly get kudos for timeliness or approachability. -- Ron
Received on Friday, 4 January 2002 02:27:27 UTC