- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:22:58 +0100
- To: "Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Paul, Many thanks. This is perfectly acceptable to the XHTML2 WG. Best wishes, Steven Pemberton For the XHTML2 WG On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 18:31:23 +0200, Grosso, Paul <pgrosso@ptc.com> wrote: > Thank you for your comments at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008AprJun/ > 0011 > on the XML Base Second Edition PER. > > Regarding: > >> The value of the xml:base attribute is interpreted >> as a Legacy Extended IRI (LEIRI). The characters >> allowed in a LEIRI include %x0-1F which aren't all >> allowed in XML 1.0; maybe a note to point out that >> xml:base doesn't support all Legacy Extended IRIs but >> only a subset would be welcome. > >> It would be nice to have an example of an xml:base >> with an actual IRI in it. > > The XML Core WG has reviewed these comments and agrees to > make the following clarifications to XML Base Second Edition: > > We will add a parenthetical comment in section 3.1: > "However, some characters allowed in LEIRIs are not > legal XML characters and cannot therefore appear in > xml:base values." > > We have added an example in section 3.1 containing an > xml:base attribute whose value is an IRI (not just a URI). > > See also > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2008JulSep/ > 0000 > for previous reponses. > > > We hope to transition XML Base to Recommendation within > the next few weeks. Please let us know if you accept > our disposition of these comments as soon as feasible. > If we have not heard by September 22, we will assume > you have no objection to our resolution. > > Paul Grosso > for the XML Core WG
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2008 13:23:16 UTC