- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:43:06 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, Henry Thompson <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Message-ID: <87hd70mxv9.fsf_-_@nwalsh.com>
/ Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> was heard to say: | On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:07:01 +0100, Norman Walsh | <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> wrote: |> / Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> was heard to say: |> | Given that there are still quite some outstanding issues[1] on XLink |> | 1.1 it is unclear to me how it can proceed to CR[2]. |> |> The working group believes that it has addressed the issues (if you think |> I missed one, please let me know.) | | Well, replies to several of my oustanding comments were missing when I | saw that the moving to CR fase was initiated and in fact a reply to | at least one comment has still not been recieved[1]. In the mean | time, some responses from the WG have been rejected as well for as | far as I can see valid reasons so it is still unclear to me how it | can proceed to CR given that. Anyway, given how it goes I assume the | XML Core WG wants to address all comments raised against XLink 1.1 so | all should be fine. Thank you. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 15:43:18 UTC