- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:22:23 +0100
- To: "Norman Walsh" <Norman.Walsh@sun.com>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, "Henry Thompson" <ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:07:01 +0100, Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> wrote: > / Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> was heard to say: > | Given that there are still quite some outstanding issues[1] on XLink > | 1.1 it is unclear to me how it can proceed to CR[2]. > > The working group believes that it has addressed the issues (if you think > I missed one, please let me know.) Well, replies to several of my oustanding comments were missing when I saw that the moving to CR fase was initiated and in fact a reply to at least one comment has still not been recieved[1]. In the mean time, some responses from the WG have been rejected as well for as far as I can see valid reasons so it is still unclear to me how it can proceed to CR given that. Anyway, given how it goes I assume the XML Core WG wants to address all comments raised against XLink 1.1 so all should be fine. [1]<http://www.w3.org/mid/20050804130243.u595pa5hnngg80w0@webmail.annevankesteren.nl> -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 00:22:32 UTC