- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 09:40:25 +0100
- To: "Ignacio Hernandez-Ros" <ihr@xbrl.org>
- Cc: <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> Then, I would like to know if the XPointer "redefine-schema.xsd#id_type" is
> reaching the element defined if original-schema but with the new type.
Barename fragment identifiers such as the one above, when resolved
against XML documents, always identify fragments of that document, as
a document. At the level of XML and the XPointer basic framework,
there is no notion of redefinition, or schema components, or any of
that.
If the XML Schema Working Group ever complete their work on Schema
Component Identifiers and define a _new_ XPointer scheme for that
purpose, your question will become relevant.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEerN5kjnJixAXWBoRAsLkAJ9qolhc139oVwnl5hjpJNtWf6gZbwCbBjLh
gMGTT9nDH9dG+c8cEN+TO3U=
=COz6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 29 May 2006 08:40:34 UTC