W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org > July to September 2001

XLink errata: display: run-in

From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 20:23:25 -0700
Message-Id: <p05100316b77024357474@[192.168.123.102]>
To: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
Dear XML Linking Working Group,

Evidently the report below got lost [0]. Please add removing the
"display: run-in" rule to XLink errata. Here are two more screen shots
[1,2], this time from the REC, both in MacIE 5.1b1 (the current Mac OS
X public beta). The problem reported for MacIE 5.0 (the current release
version) still exists. Thank you, and belated congratulations on your
Recommendation.

[0] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2001JanMar/0011.html
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/01/screenshots/REC-xlink-20010627-MacIE.png
[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/01/screenshots/REC-xlink-20010627-2-MacIE.png

>Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 23:28:47 -0700
>To: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
>From: Susan Lesch <lesch@w3.org>
>Subject: display: run-in
>Cc:
>Bcc:
>X-Attachments:
>
>There are a couple of problems with this style rule in Mac IE 5 in
>the XLink Proposed Recommendation [0]. It appears to come from XML
>Second Edition.
>
>     dt.label       { display: run-in; }
>
>See screenshots [1,2]. I don't know a work-around for this except to
>delete the rule.
>
>Also, in Appendices A.1 and A.2, the definition terms run into their
>definitions. A newline between the dt and dd will fix this. (A space
>instead between the dt and dd makes it look like there is no CSS rule.)
>
>[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/PR-xlink-20001220/
>[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/01/screenshots/PR-xlink-20001220-1.gif
>[2] http://www.w3.org/2001/01/screenshots/PR-xlink-20001220-2.gif
Received on Monday, 9 July 2001 23:23:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:08:13 UTC