- From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 17:35:52 +0100
- To: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com
- Cc: svg-developers@egroups.com, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org, XLink@egroups.com, Jferraio@adobe.com, Steven_DeRose@brown.edu, chris@w3.org, eve.maler@east.sun.com, marc.foodman@sun.com, Daniel.Veillard@w3.org, djweitzner@w3.org, mbierman@adobe.com
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 11:24:15AM -0500, AndrewWatt2001@aol.com wrote: > But when writing anything but the most trivial SVG code we cannot avoid using > "XPointer" syntax e.g. to access a filter using syntax along the lines of > "filter:url(#MySpot)" - the so-called "bare bones" XPointer syntax. As far as I can tell, if Sun's try to sue you because you use #name addressing pattern, that's a patent I didn't heard about. Please reread the context of this problem, it's string search based XPointers expressions which may infringe the patent ! No need to spread more FUD on this issue. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
Received on Thursday, 18 January 2001 11:36:05 UTC