- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 14:18:27 -0400
- To: Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr
- Cc: "Steven J. DeRose" <Steven_DeRose@Brown.edu>, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
At 06:58 PM 5/5/01 +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: >On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 12:15:54PM -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote: > > Most of those discussions took place a long time ago, and I don't even > know > > if the WG has had much continuous membership since then, but the XLink WG > > doesn't have an especially sterling record, at least from this observer's > > perspective. > > The observers have the access to all the logs of the issues since 99 > http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/12/LinkingIssueList.html In this case, the only issue appears to be: http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/12/LinkingIssueList.html#XP42 That's not exactly a wealth of information. I could, of course, be missing something important in the public record. If so, please let me know. Thanks, Simon St.Laurent - Associate Editor, O'Reilly & Associates XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2001 14:18:05 UTC