- From: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:24:03 +0100
- To: <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>
- Cc: "HTML WG" <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>, "Tim Berners-Lee" <tbl@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Philipp Hoschka" <hoschka@w3.org>, <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org>
Regarding http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink-naming/, "XLink Markup Name Control", which we assume is a result of the following requirement: "In a meeting between Tim Berners-Lee, Dan Connolly (representing XML Schema), Philipp Hoschka (representing SMIL) and Daniel Veillard (representing XLink), there was consensus that Xlink and XML Schema should not exit CR unless there is a solution to generic link recognition that allows XHTML and SMIL to continue to use their current linking markup. In particular, it must be demonstrated that a program can use this solution to detect the linking semantics of XHTML and SMIL linking attributes." http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000JulSep/0169 .html The HTML WG has read the proposed solution, and have come to the conclusion that this note doesn't address our problems. While there are several aspects that are left open, which we will be happy to elaborate on in more detail, the central architectural failure is the ability to describe more than one URL per element. In July 1999 we had already communicated this architectural requirement as being critical: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-html-cg/1999JulSep/0026.html "Pemberton: "multiple URLs" seems to be critical to address, architecturally, in the 1st cut; other HTML WG requirements are less critical" Best wishes, Steven Pemberton Chair, HTML WG
Received on Thursday, 14 December 2000 05:25:13 UTC