Re: Your comments on XLink CR

I thought we had discussed submitting a comment requesting
that XPointer define a more minimal subset that, among other
things, did not include range.  Did we not submit such a comment?

At 09:25 2000 12 12 -0500, Eve L. Maler wrote:
>Having personally submitted the comments and then implemented the changes 
>:-), I'm satisfied.  If there's anyone else on the TF who is *not* 
>satisfied, please speak up by the end of this week.
>
>         Eve
>
>At 11:40 AM 12/12/00 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>>   Hi,
>>
>>In order to formally close the loop to request PR, it would be
>>nice if you could review the XLink CR Disposition of Comments
>>items concerning the point raised by the Task Force:
>>
>>   http://www.w3.org/XML/2000/10/xlink-CR-comments.html#N529
>>
>>I think the XML Linking WG tried to comply as much as possible,
>>i.e. 2 items were accepted and the two other ones were postponed
>>for a later revision.
>>Could you indicate if you accept the Working Group decision on
>>those issues ?
>>
>>   thanks in advance,
>>
>>Daniel
>>
>>P.S.: what is blocking the publication of the "XML Linking and Style"
>>       NOTE ? Do you think you will get the resources to get this out
>>       beginning of January (or earlier ?)
>>
>>--
>>Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes  | libxml Gnome XML toolkit
>>Tel : +33 476 615 257  | 655, avenue de l'Europe | http://xmlsoft.org/
>>Fax : +33 476 615 207  | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Rpmfind search site
>>  http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org  | http://rpmfind.net/
>
>--
>Eve Maler                                          +1 781 442 3190
>Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center    eve.maler @ east.sun.com
>
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2000 11:50:16 UTC