- From: Matthew Wilson <matthew@mjwilson.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2000 22:10:18 +0000
- To: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@east.sun.com>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
At 18:08 08/11/00 -0500, Eve L. Maler wrote: [snip] >>I still have some issues with the definition of here() though. There is >>no guarantee that the XPointer being evaluated is contained within an XML >>node, for example - shouldn't the spec describe this as an error condition? > >I believe it already does, when it says in Section 5.4.4 that "This >expression results in a syntax error if the resource in which the >containing XPointer appears is not XML." Do you agree? Yes - although what does "containing" in "the containing XPointer" mean? There does not seem to be any containment going on (necessarily). Matthew Wilson
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2000 17:11:03 UTC