Re: XML Linking Implementation Questionnaire

• From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
• Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:29:48 -0700
• To: jose.kahan@w3.org, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
• Message-Id: <3.0.32.20001018134054.00e4dfb8@pophost.arbortext.com>

At 16:01 2000 10 18 +0200, jose.kahan@w3.org wrote:
>	    XML Linking Implementation Questionnaire
>	    ========================================

>>Does (or will) the technology claim XPointer conformance?
>Yes
>
>>Please provide details about the parts of XLink implemented.
>(you mean XPointer?)
>
>>- Bare names
>Yes
>
>>- Child sequences
>No
>
>>- id() function
>Yes
>
>>- Full XPath
>No. We only support a minimal functionality (location steps, and predicate 
>counts) for the moment. 

How can one claim conformance if the technology only implements a small
part of the spec?

Received on Wednesday, 18 October 2000 18:30:28 UTC