- From: Eve L. Maler <elm@east.sun.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 13:43:36 -0500
- To: spec-prod@w3.org, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
>X-Sender: elm@abnaki.East.Sun.Com >X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 >Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 13:36:51 -0500 >To: <chrisr@appwebtech.com> >From: "Eve L. Maler" <elm@East.Sun.COM> >Subject: RE: XLINK >Cc: "'Eve L. Maler'" <Eve.Maler@East.Sun.COM> > >(Do you mind if I forward your response and mine to the comments list and >to the list where the XMLspec DTD is discussed?) > >This should be very doable, and it's a great idea. We would need to >update the XSL stylesheet(s) that we use for formatting the spec. > >I happen to own the XMLspec DTD that is used for a lot of specs, including >the Linking ones. I suspect that an attribute is needed to indicate >whether the example is complete enough to be extracted; perhaps we also >need the ability to mark up code fragments that should be "hidden" in the >spec but revealed in the extraction. > > Eve > >At 01:14 PM 3/21/00 -0500, Christopher M. Rodier wrote: >>That would be perfect. A button that when clicked allows you to download >>files that if extracted into a directory are already functional to view. >>Right now I understand xml and am trying to implement xlink in dynamicly >>built web pages that are built with xml tags. I understand dtd's but now I >>am trying to figure out where the xlink namespace declaration belongs. If >>it was in a working example it would be easy to see what level in the xml >>tree the xlink namespace declaration belonged at. It is taking way to long >>for me to pick up xlink when if this example highlighted in blue was >>combined into working files instead of chunks that leave you to put the >>pieces of the puzzle together. Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center elm @ east.sun.com
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2000 13:41:53 UTC