RE: comments on 21-February-2000 XLink WD

At 01:19 PM 2/25/00 -0500, DuCharme, Robert wrote:
> >I believe we've also now removed all uses of XLink as a noun.
>
>It's still in the second paragraph of 3.1, which is the only place I ever
>saw it.

Oops, I'll fix.

> >So it's "make recognizable."  Perhaps the heavy noun phrase at the end
> >could be moved up: "Document creators can use the XLink global attributes
> >to make recognizable as XLink elements the elements in their own namespace,
> >or even in a namespace they don't control."  What do you think?
>
>That looks better, although I should have noticed "recognizable" originally.

Maybe I'll play with it some more.  They're both awkward.

>Again, I apologize for not paying closer attention when checking last
>month's notes against this month's draft.

No problem at all -- it's nice to know we've been responding to the right 
sorts of issues when we do the revs.

         Eve
--
Eve Maler            Sun Microsystems
elm @ east.sun.com    +1 781 442 3190

Received on Friday, 25 February 2000 13:30:10 UTC