- From: DuCharme, Robert <DuCharmR@moodys.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:19:58 -0500
- To: "'Eve L. Maler'" <elm@east.sun.com>
- Cc: "'www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org'" <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>
Sorry. I had a printout of a 10-Jan-2000 draft with written comments on it and was looking through the new one to see how many of my comments were still applicable, and I guess I got confused. >1. >I believe we've also now removed all uses of XLink as a noun. It's still in the second paragraph of 3.1, which is the only place I ever saw it. >2. >So it's "make recognizable." Perhaps the heavy noun phrase at the end >could be moved up: "Document creators can use the XLink global attributes >to make recognizable as XLink elements the elements in their own namespace, >or even in a namespace they don't control." What do you think? That looks better, although I should have noticed "recognizable" originally. >3. "conceptually a subset of extended links...syntactically different." That nails it. Again, I apologize for not paying closer attention when checking last month's notes against this month's draft. Bob DuCharme www.snee.com/bob <bob@ snee.com> "The elements be kind to thee, and make thy spirits all of comfort!" Anthony and Cleopatra, III ii
Received on Friday, 25 February 2000 13:20:02 UTC