- From: MURATA Makoto <muraw3c@attglobal.net>
- Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 01:39:48 +0900
- To: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, w3c-xml-core-wg@w3.org
In message "Re: XBase is in conflict with RFC 2396", Richard Tobin wrote... >> I think this is a violation of RFC 2396. > >I think XBase goes beyond RFC 2396, and RFC 2396 should be updated. >In particular, the RFC refers to "the base URI of a document", but >XBase allows a document to have different base URIs in different >parts. This is essential for some purposes (eg reserialisation >after entity expansion). I think that we should not allow default values for xml:base prior to such updates to RFC 2396. As a co-author of RFC 2376 (XML Media Types), I am preparing an Internet Draft which is intended to supersede RFC 2376. This draft will point out this issue. It will then be reviewed by IETF people, especially URI people. ---- MURATA Makoto muraw3c@attglobal.net
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2000 12:39:34 UTC