- From: <ok@cs.otago.ac.nz>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:06:18 +1300
- To: www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org
Earlier drafts of Infoset followed the XML 1.0 specification in making comment items optional. The 2 Feb 2001 draft appears to require them, which is inconsistent with the XML 1.0 specification (1st and 2nd editions). Perhaps the intent is that Infoset specifies the full set of things that MIGHT exist and be of interest to a markup- sensitive application, but since XML-related specifications have had a nasty habit of not distinguishing between the needs of markup-sensitive applications (editors and generators) and structure-controlled applications (browsers and other information consumers), it would be as well if Infoset set something explicit about this, along the lines of Infoset specifies all the information that any XML application, including markup-sensitive applications, should be able to get, it is an upper bound. It does NOT specify which kinds of elements a structure- controlled application must be bothered with; it is not a lower bound. In particular, the fact that comments, CDATA boundaries, and entity boundaries exist does NOT mean that every application has to be confronted with them or that they must be included in every specification based on Infoset.
Received on Thursday, 15 February 2001 19:44:09 UTC