- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 10:32:54 -0400 (EDT)
- To: alewis@tibco.com (Amelia A Lewis)
- Cc: jcowan@reutershealth.com (John Cowan), www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org
Amelia A Lewis scripsit: > Then the same objection applies to #x85 and #x2028. If there is good > reason to have #xD in S, then those reasons are also good enough to have > #x85 and #x2028. The *only* reason to have #xD in S is backward compatibility. No such reason exists for #x85 and #x2028. -- There is / One art John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> No more / No less http://www.reutershealth.com To do / All things http://www.ccil.org/~cowan With art- / Lessness -- Piet Hein
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 10:34:31 UTC