Re: Issue: inconsistency of S production and treatment of line endings.

On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 10:17, John Cowan wrote:
> Amelia A Lewis scripsit:
> > For consistency, redefine S to
> > remove #xD, which cannot appear after line ending normalization.
> 
> As noted, it is possible by sufficient entity abuse to get a #xD character
> into the replacement text of a parameter entity, so we do not plan to change
> S even though any *physical* #xD character will be normalized away by 2.11.

Then the same objection applies to #x85 and #x2028.  If there is good
reason to have #xD in S, then those reasons are also good enough to have
#x85 and #x2028.

Amy!
-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Architect, TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
alewis@tibco.com

Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2002 10:22:14 UTC