Re: S production in XML 1.1 from John Cowan on 2002-07-14 (www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org from July 2002)

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2002 23:16:38 -0400 (EDT)
To: ricko@topologi.com (Rick Jelliffe)
Cc: www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <200207140317.XAA09194@mail.reutershealth.com>

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> Have the additions needed for supporting Unicode 3.1 now slipped below the level 
> of "changes that force a version-up"?  

I don't think so, given that we are still materially changing the
definition of WF-ness.

-- 
John Cowan                                <jcowan@reutershealth.com>     
http://www.reutershealth.com              http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Yakka foob mog.  Grug pubbawup zink wattoom gazork.  Chumble spuzz.
    -- Calvin, giving Newton's First Law "in his own words"

Received on Saturday, 13 July 2002 23:18:16 UTC