- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 09:50:20 -0400
- To: "Rob Lugt" <roblugt@elcel.com>, <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Cc: <www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org>
>I think the good people at IANA [1] would treat this request with the scorn >which you have poured onto Blueberry. > I don't think so. The IANA only registers names of character sets actually used. They do not attempt to judge whether those character sets make sense. But even if they did it doesn't matter Even if the IANA were to refuse to register this encoding for some reason, XML can still use it. XML 1.0 suggests but does not require that character set names in the encoding declaration be registered with the IANA. If the IANA doesn't want to register IBD-8, we can just call it x-IBD-8 and use it anyway. I certainly don't intended to use such a non-standard encoding, but that's sort of the point. This proposal let's IBM have their cake, without forcing everyone else to eat it. -- +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ | The XML Bible (IDG Books, 1999) | | http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/books/bible/ | | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764532367/cafeaulaitA/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://metalab.unc.edu/javafaq/ | | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://metalab.unc.edu/xml/ | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+
Received on Friday, 22 June 2001 09:53:48 UTC