- From: Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:38:05 +0100
- To: jose.kahan@w3.org
- Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Jose, please see my previous posting. Regards Tommy On 4/13/05, Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Tommy, > > Shivaram and I made the change to 2.5.3.3[1] to say: > > <quote> > If the initial request included the optional <PendingNotification> > element, the XKMS service notifies the client about the completion of the > request processing using the notification mechanism specified in this > element. > </quote> > > Do you think it is precise enough or should I add the out of band > notification mechanism indication, which you hinted here below? I think > it's good as it is. If there's no notification message precised, the > client has either to go poll the server to know if the request has been > completed or use an out-of-band mechanism as you explained. > > Anyway, feedback is always welcome :) > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 04:57:44PM +0100, Tommy Lindberg wrote: > > > > You may want adjust it to reflect the fact that <PendingNotification> > > is optional i.e. it may not be present and that the service therefore > > uses an out of band notification mechanism. > > -jose > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-PR-PUB/PR-PUB-xkms-part-1.html > > >
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 21:39:10 UTC