Re: Asynchronous test cases from Yunhao Zhang on 2004-10-19 (www-xkms@w3.org from October 2004)

From: Yunhao Zhang <yzhang@sqldata.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:03:51 -0400
To: "Tommy Lindberg" <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>, <alvarorg@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: <www-xkms@w3.org>
Message-ID: <005701c4b5ec$d8f10540$6422fecc@sqldata.com>

Hi Tommy,

Isn't T7 only a special case in asynchronous processing? T8, T11 and T12
seem to be valid and cover more common situations where XKISS requests are
processed immediately in a very short period of time.

Regards,

Yunhao

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tommy Lindberg" <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
To: <alvarorg@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: <www-xkms@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 9:33 AM
Subject: Asynchronous test cases


>
> Hi Guillermo -
>
> Could we make the message sequences in the asynchronous test cases
> consistent between T7, T8, T11, T12 so that all of them use
> StatusRequest's the way T7 does?
>
> Regards
> Tommy
>
>

Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 15:10:48 UTC