- From: Guillermo Álvaro Rey <alvarorg@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:59:05 +0100
- To: Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 14:59:07 UTC
> Could we make the message sequences in the asynchronous test cases > consistent between T7, T8, T11, T12 so that all of them use > StatusRequest's the way T7 does? Hi Tommy, all, Yes, I think so. I was talking before with Jose and if nobody disagrees I will write a new paragraph in the Test Collection site stating the way the completion of the response is triggered by a StatusRequest in these tests. And then I will also add the needed StatusRequests in T8, T11 & T12. + We were also planning to update the numeration of the tests, being XKISS-Tn and XKRSS-Tn instead of Tn and T10n, if nobody has any objection. + Before we finally agree on Yunhao's revised XKRSS test cases, we were thinking of defining all of them synchronous, and then later define the same scenarios but asynchronous, for consistency. + I would like to be sure that the new Test Cases are going to be used finally before mapping the assertions to the scenarios. By the way, for new scenario contributions it would be very handy if you could report which assertions are being covered. :) And also the sample messages would be nice. :)) Cheers! - -Guillermo
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2004 14:59:07 UTC