- From: Guillermo Álvaro Rey <alvarorg@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 19:09:58 +0100
- To: www-xkms@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1098036597.18044.38.camel@lamb.dsg.cs.tcd.ie>
Hi all, I have updated the Test Collection site [1] with Yunhao's Revised Test Cases. I agree that it's a good idea to have these simple cases and then make more elaborated ones (for example, combining xkiss and xkrss). Cheers, - -Guillermo [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/test-suite/CR-XKMS-test-suite.html#testcollection El vie, 15-10-2004 a las 16:24, Jose Kahan escribió: > Sorry I hadn't answered to this thread before. > > In my opinion, the best thing to make good tests is to have tests > that don't combine too many things if at all. Otherwise, it gets > very confusing to evaluate success or failure of a test scenario. > > That's why I had advised Guillermo early on to simplify the tests. > Rather than having one test scenario that does everything, it's better > to have many test scenarios that are targeted to testing something > specific. > > By combining X-KRSS and X-KISS messages we may be taking away the focus > of the test. If those messages can be combined, there should be some > specific tests aimed at that goal, but this shouldn't preclude having > individual X-KRSS and X-KISS tests. > > I'm glad that they have been separated. > > I'll give more feedback next week after looking at the tests, and while > updating the wbs form. > > Cheers, > > -jose >
Received on Sunday, 17 October 2004 18:10:03 UTC