Re: updated schema

Jose,
 
Could you please check with the W3C czars on this.  The worst case is that the PR draft will have a new name space - like 2004/10  .  If this happens, then we will have to update the schema for URI references and regenerate examples.  Could you please let us know soon so that I don't have to redo all of the examples insertion work (I have done some right now.)
 
If others have any suggestions, please speak up.
 
Thanks
 
/Shivaram

Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org> wrote:

Hi Shivaram,

Thanks for the explanations.

I uploaded the file to the XKMS directory.

I have a problem to do the same under /2002/03/xkms*, because there are
links from the the CR spec pointing to that exact location. We cannot
update the schema without publishing a new CR, or the link would be
pointing to something that doesn't correspond to the text on the spec.

The schema changes were slight, so that's why we kept the same URL.
However, the spec has to be published too in order to have something
that is in sync.

Sorry about it. Any propositions? Should we use a temporary alternate
schema location so that people can use their validators?

-jose

On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:12:33AM -0700, Shivaram Mysore wrote:
> >From the xkms.xsd, we always had our target namespace as http://www.w3.org/2002/03/xkms#
> 
> This is similar to what DSig has:
> http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig.xsd
> 


		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!