Re: updated specs

Hi Tommy,
 
you are correct.  I believe this is what happened - I replaced only those examples that were needed to be.  For all the others there was a change in Service URI which I did not account for at that time.  
 
I will make sure that all the examples are correct in the spec compared to the drop that you provided.
 
/Shivaram

Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Shivaram -

>Tommy, I have updated the examples to fix the issue 326-jk. Can you
please check your
> automated example generation script to make sure that those changes are recorded.

Small confusion on my behalf. Maybe I am wrong, but from what I can
tell the spec examples attached in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xkms/2004Oct/0086.html are
still valid wrt issue 326-jk.

Regards
Tommy


On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:28:39 -0800 (PST), Shivaram Mysore
wrote:
> 
> 
> Folks, 
> 
> I have updated the specification [1]. Attached is the new updated schema. 
> So, please use this new schema. 
> 
> Jose, can you please upload this to [2] as I cannot upload xsd files to the
> same. 
> 
> The following issues have been resolved in this Nov 29th Draft: 
> 
> Fixed Issue TBD: Inserted "elements and" string in Para [97] 
> Fixed Issue TDB: Deleted sentence mentioning 
as this
> element does not exist from para[367] 
> Fixed Issue 315-ga-3: Typo in example - Complete fixed para [146] 
> Fixed issue 322-tl: deleted last sentence in para[83] 
> Fixed issue 323-ga: added sentences for non-compound request behaviour in
> section 3.5.2 para[134] 
> Fixed issue 324-tl: removed the OCSP row of the table in #3.2.3 and the
> related line of schema - fixed para [104] and [106] and updated schema. 
> Fixed issue 325-ga: This was fixed in Sept 6th draft, item 2 - para [94] ,
> but, the issue id was missing. 
> Fixed Issue 326-jk - Replaced all instances of "xmltrustcenter" reference in
> Service URI with "example". This will complete the fix for this issue. 
> Fixed Issue 327-jk: added phrase "Generic Description:" to the cells which
> don't have a corresponding major result in para[122] 
> 
> Issue 328-jk [3] will need a little bit of discussion on the list. This is
> the only open issue and belongs to part-2 of the spec. 
> 
> Tommy, I have updated the examples to fix the issue 326-jk. Can you please
> check your automated example generation script to make sure that those
> changes are recorded. 
> 
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-PR-DRAFT/PR-DRAFT-xkms-part-1.html 
> 
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-PR-DRAFT/Schemas/ 
> 
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/cr-issues/issues.html?view=wg#328-jk 
> 
> Thanks 
> 
> /Shivaram
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Secure Web Services, PKI, Software Architecture, Java, 
> Product Strategy and Management Consultant:
> http://www.geocities.com/shivarammysore/
> 
> ________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. 
> 
> 
>


--
Secure Web Services, PKI, Software Architecture, Java, 
Product Strategy and Management Consultant:
http://www.geocities.com/shivarammysore/


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com