- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:49:36 +0000
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Ok that's fine but can we include a recommendation to that effect in the spec, i.e. just after we say that the sequence is not determined, we should say that if you want a defined sequence, don't use a compound request. Stephen. Rich Salz wrote: > > Stephen, > > At the call today we decided to explicitly leave requests within a > compound request as unordered. That is, a server is free to respond to > the requests in any order. If sequencing is important to a client, it > should make multiple synchronous requests, for example. > > We couldn't understand a good use case that justified the additional > implementation burden on servers. > > /r$ >
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2004 17:46:33 UTC