- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 20:28:13 +0100
- To: www-xkms@w3.org
After talking with my colleagues, I got the following information: - Exit Criteria: in order to move from CR to the next step, the WG will have to fulfill each item of the exit criteria. That is, if we said that part of the exit criteria was two implementations of feature x, we will need to have them to move on. That's the first thing that we'll get asked when requesting the move. - CR period: whatever is the period we ask for, it's considered the _minimal_ period for the CR evaluation. That is, if we ask for 6 months and we find all is ready in 4 months, we will have to wait 6 months before requesting the move. This having been said, if you still agree with the exit criteria on [1] and a 6 month CR period, we will go forward with them. For the exit criteria in [1], I'm wondering if we should only require Soap 1.2, rather than request both Soap 1.1 and Soap 1.2. Following the same thought track, I don't know how to evaluate the importance of the last one, the Payload Authentication and TLS bindings criteria because I don't know if everyone has to implement those features or if they are optional. There will have to be at least one implementation. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/rqim.html#cr-crit
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 14:28:45 UTC