- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 20:16:14 +0100
- To: Shivaram Mysore <Shivaram.Mysore@Sun.COM>
- Cc: stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie, www-xkms@w3.org
Shivaram, Stephen, We got some pre-meeting feedback. The WG has been requested to clear up a bit the Last Call issue page [1] as it was found confusing. There are two kinds of mixups. The first mixup comes from the following paragraph: ------ This page will contain two tables. Outstanding issues are recorded in the first table. They are typed as either Editorial (including typos and small clarifications), Clarification (where significant explanatory text is required) or Major. In some cases, a volunteer has been identified, but in case not, then implementation of the proposed resolution is left to the specification editor(s). Once an issue has been resolved (meaning that a resolution satisfactory to the group is agreed and has been included in the latest version of the specification), the issue is moved to the `Resolved Issues' table. The issue index number is maintained to allow for consistent referencinwas found confusing --- The issue classification was not used at all in the Last Call issue list and the WG got requested to either fix that paragraph or fix the issue list to look like the one in [2]. The second mixup comes from the red text comment that appears in some issues, but not in all so it's not clear what is its function and why some paragraphs don't have those comments. Could you take care of fixing this page? Thanks! -jose [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/xkms-spec-lastcall-issues.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-20030331/issues.html
Received on Friday, 30 January 2004 14:17:01 UTC