W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > February 2004

Re: incosistency between part 1 & 2 specs

From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:52:23 +0100
To: Shivaram Mysore <Shivaram.Mysore@Sun.COM>
Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040203165223.GE2053@inrialpes.fr>

Hi Shivaram,

I fixed the refs. to Soap to point to the latest versions as you
requested in your previous message.

As I was unable to get a URL pointing to the Soap 1.1 note, I did
the same thing as the Soap 1.2 spec and I pointed to it using
/TR/SOAP/ (which in fact redirects to Soap 1.2, but that's not
our problem).

Could you give input on the following?

> Is this a similar typo? In [2]p[353], we have:
> SOAP 1.1 Transport	All	REQUIRED	Services MUST support
>                                     the use of SOAP 1.1 encapsulation	
> SOAP 1.2 Transport	All	RECOMMENDED	Services SHOULD support
>                                     the use of SOAP 1.2 encapsulation
> Shouldn't it be required for Soap 1.2 and recommended for Soap 1.1?


Received on Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:53:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:42 UTC