Re: new tests

Hi Jose -

> I want to mention which server(s) actually support them. Is it Tommy's?
Yes.

> - Similarly, I think I should mention which servers actually implement X-KRSS.
I have implemented the whole shebang including XKRSS.

Regards
Tommy


On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:44:11 +0100, Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org> wrote:
> Guillermo,
> 
> Thanks. I've added the new X-KRSS tests and updated the text of
> the previous ones to the wbs form. I've also added the
> compound and optional tests.
> 
> I had again the same problem with the wbs form and the survey widget
> didn't get copied. Dom is working on it so it should be ready tomorrow.
> 
> Some comments:
> 
> - I'm confused in that in your changelog, you say that the XKISS tests
>   had been modified. Is this true? The text of the first test looks
>   the same, so maybe  the test messages are the ones that have been
>   modified.
> 
>   If the tests have been modified, we either need to invalidate the
>   previous tests (clear them up) or trust everyone to go thru each test
>   and update its info. Note that this is not a compliancy testing, but
>   interop test.
> 
> - The X-KRSS tests don't have any test messages anymore. Is this
>   something intentional? Even if the messages depend on each server, it
>   can be useful to have an example to see how they look like. It may
>   clear up a bit the text-only description.
> 
> - I'm not sure what text to use to describe the optional tests. I added
>   something on the lines of "these tests are for testing the optional
>   features of XKMS. We only need one client and server implementation.
>   You can ignore them if you have not implemented them". I want to
>   mention which server(s) actually support them. Is it Tommy's?
> 
> - Similarly, I think I should mention which servers actually implement
>   X-KRSS.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> -jose
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 December 2004 10:45:54 UTC