- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:44:11 +0100
- To: Guillermo ?lvaro Rey <alvarorg@cs.tcd.ie>
- Cc: XKMS WG <www-xkms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20041214174411.GA13865@inrialpes.fr>
Guillermo, Thanks. I've added the new X-KRSS tests and updated the text of the previous ones to the wbs form. I've also added the compound and optional tests. I had again the same problem with the wbs form and the survey widget didn't get copied. Dom is working on it so it should be ready tomorrow. Some comments: - I'm confused in that in your changelog, you say that the XKISS tests had been modified. Is this true? The text of the first test looks the same, so maybe the test messages are the ones that have been modified. If the tests have been modified, we either need to invalidate the previous tests (clear them up) or trust everyone to go thru each test and update its info. Note that this is not a compliancy testing, but interop test. - The X-KRSS tests don't have any test messages anymore. Is this something intentional? Even if the messages depend on each server, it can be useful to have an example to see how they look like. It may clear up a bit the text-only description. - I'm not sure what text to use to describe the optional tests. I added something on the lines of "these tests are for testing the optional features of XKMS. We only need one client and server implementation. You can ignore them if you have not implemented them". I want to mention which server(s) actually support them. Is it Tommy's? - Similarly, I think I should mention which servers actually implement X-KRSS. Cheers, -jose
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 17:44:54 UTC