- From: Blair Dillaway <blaird@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:21:56 -0800
- To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "Www-Xkms \(E-mail\)" <www-xkms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0A0B36F65A314D4AB8D2CF1D1FD835F101B1B84B@df-muttley.dogfood>
I believe exact match is the best option, and the text below seems fine. If the requestor wants a 'loose' match, so they can sort through all the responses looking for ones that are interesting, they should send an ambiguous query - such only a key value. I would be concerned about 'best guess' or a 'service defined matching criteria' as it makes it pretty hard for clients to know what to expect back from any given query. I agree, we should not have a match flag. Blair ________________________________ From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:pbaker@verisign.com] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 5:41 PM To: Www-Xkms (E-mail) I am attempting to deal with the matching rules. What should we specify, exact match, best guess? Should the result match all the terms or match any of the terms? In the past we discussed a match flag, is this really necessary? I hope not. Do we need to do more than this? Element <QueryKeyBinding> The <QueryKeyBinding> element is derived from the KeyBindingAbstractType and is used to perform a query that results in the return of one or more matching key bindings. A key binding matches the QueryKeyBinding if: * The key binding contains all the <UseKeyWith> elements contained in the query, and * The key binding contains all the <KeyInfo> elements contained in the query The <QueryKeyBinding> element extends the KeyBindingAbstractType with the following additional elements: <TimeInstant> [Optional] The Time Instant for which the query is made. If no time instant is specified the default is the time the request was made. The following schema defines the <QueryKeyBinding> element and KeyBindingType:
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 16:22:01 UTC