- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 07:19:31 -0700
- To: "Www-Xkms (E-mail)" <www-xkms@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2003 10:19:34 UTC
I took a look at this. It seems to make sense to me. A NCName production is lexicaly the 'local' part of a URI - i.e. after the # mark. This seems better than anyURI, it would mean that references to requests and responses would no longer require the # mark. On the other hand this would break all the examples (not a real issue) and any code. On the other hand the changes to the existing code would be pretty simple. Do we want to do this or not? Chopra - 11 OriginalRequestId (RequestAbstractType), RespondID (PendingRequest) , RequestId (ResultType) should be of type "xsd:NCName" as they are referring to "xsd:ID" type elements in other XML docs.
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2003 10:19:34 UTC