- From: Mike Just <Mike.Just@entrust.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 13:04:10 -0400
- To: "'reagle@w3.org'" <reagle@w3.org>, www-xkms@w3.org, "Frederick Hirsch (E-mail)" <fjh@fjhirsch.com>
Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 13:05:09 UTC
One comment for Joseph and a request for Frederick below prefixed by [MJ]. -----Original Message----- From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org] Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:21 PM To: Shivaram Mysore; www-xkms@w3.org Subject: Re: F2F3 minutes <...snip...> > [2] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS/xkms-issues-list.html - Meta comment, capturing who has the action item is even more important than who raised the issue! <smile/> If not specified, is it presumed to be the Editor? ----- [MJ] It actually says at the top of the last column that the "volunteer" defaults to the specification editor(s) if left blank. Do you think this need to be more prominent? ----- ?. I'd still like us to use dsig:KeyInfo instead of creating a new element type derived from the dsig:KeyInfoType, but I'll give this some more thought. 7.I'm not sure if this was completely resolved. The decision was that we don't think there were side effects and Frederick should provide an example of his concern if he thinks so. ----- [MJ] Frederick, can you provide some more context regarding Issue-7 [1], e.g. what you think would need to be done. At the meeting, I don't believe that a real issue was recognized so it was highlighted as resolved. ----- Cheers, Mike [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS/xkms-issues-list.html#issue-7
Received on Friday, 13 September 2002 13:05:09 UTC