W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > March 2002

RE: status of the nation...

From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 08:37:38 -0800
Message-ID: <2F3EC696EAEED311BB2D009027C3F4F4058699C1@vhqpostal.verisign.com>
To: "'reagle@w3.org'" <reagle@w3.org>, "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "'stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie'" <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>, www-xkms@w3.org

It means that the issuer makes no assertion as to the status of the
certificate after the expiry period.


Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng.
Principal Scientist
VeriSign Inc.
pbaker@verisign.com
781 245 6996 x227


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joseph Reagle [mailto:reagle@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 1:42 PM
> To: Hallam-Baker, Phillip; 'stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie';
> www-xkms@w3.org
> Subject: Re: status of the nation...
> 
> 
> On Tuesday 05 March 2002 13:02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> > In most cases then a responder sending back invalid would 
> be expected to
> > send back a start date with no end date. But it is possible that a
> > responder would need to send back invalid with a validity 
> interval closed
> > at both ends.
> 
> Why would that be? What does it mean if it is closed for the time 
> afterwards? (Regardless, the answer should be documented.)
> 
> -- 
> 
> Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
> W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
> IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
> W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
> 



Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 11:36:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:38 UTC