- From: Mike Just <Mike.Just@entrust.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 09:03:24 -0500
- To: "'Hallam-Baker, Phillip'" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "'www-xkms@w3.org'" <www-xkms@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 09:03:57 UTC
Although I see the advantage of using the abstract types (it's easier to identify related elements; also makes for a shorter schema doc), I find the flat structure much easier to read and analyze. Mike -----Original Message----- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip [mailto:pbaker@verisign.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 12:16 PM To: www-xkms@w3.org Subject: Hierarchy etc. All, How do people think we should organize the schema? One option is the current 'flat' datastructure in which LocateRequest and ValidateRequest are both top level types A second option is to adopt the use of abstract types etc in the manner of SAML and introduce a RequestAbstractType that is extended by LocateRequesttype and ValidateRequestType Phill Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng. Principal Scientist VeriSign Inc. pbaker@verisign.com 781 245 6996 x227
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2002 09:03:57 UTC