- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 13:41:44 -0500
- To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "'stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie'" <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>, www-xkms@w3.org
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 13:02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: > In most cases then a responder sending back invalid would be expected to > send back a start date with no end date. But it is possible that a > responder would need to send back invalid with a validity interval closed > at both ends. Why would that be? What does it mean if it is closed for the time afterwards? (Regardless, the answer should be documented.) -- Joseph Reagle Jr. http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/ W3C Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair http://www.w3.org/Signature/ W3C XML Encryption Chair http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2002 14:43:52 UTC