W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > March 2002

Re: status of the nation...

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 13:41:44 -0500
Message-Id: <200203051841.NAA09718@tux.w3.org>
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, "'stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie'" <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>, www-xkms@w3.org
On Tuesday 05 March 2002 13:02, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> In most cases then a responder sending back invalid would be expected to
> send back a start date with no end date. But it is possible that a
> responder would need to send back invalid with a validity interval closed
> at both ends.

Why would that be? What does it mean if it is closed for the time 
afterwards? (Regardless, the answer should be documented.)


Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2002 14:43:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:38 UTC