W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > March 2002

Re: Hierarchy etc.

From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 17:21:33 +0000
Message-ID: <3C84FE9D.DB9BECB9@baltimore.ie>
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
CC: www-xkms@w3.org

Without hardly any schmea expertise at all to back me up, I 
strongly prefer the former (flat). 

Question: is there any implementation benefit to using 
abstract types? If not, I think they're just not worth
it.

Stephen.

"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
>         How do people think we should organize the schema?
> 
> One option is the current 'flat' datastructure in which LocateRequest and
> ValidateRequest are both top level types
> 
> A second option is to adopt the use of abstract types etc in the manner of
> SAML and introduce a RequestAbstractType that is extended by
> LocateRequesttype and ValidateRequestType
> 
>         Phill
> 
> Phillip Hallam-Baker FBCS C.Eng.
> Principal Scientist
> VeriSign Inc.
> pbaker@verisign.com
> 781 245 6996 x227
> 

-- 
____________________________________________________________
Stephen Farrell         				   
Baltimore Technologies,   tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716
39 Parkgate Street,                     fax: +353 1 881 7000
Dublin 8.                mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie
Ireland                             http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2002 12:21:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:38 UTC