- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 18:04:19 +0000
- To: Krishna Sankar <ksankar@cisco.com>
- CC: www-xkms-ws@w3c.org
Wouldn't ws-security create a referencing/timing problem for us? Stephen. Krishna Sankar wrote: > > phb, > > | > | 5) How do we address message signing? Profile ws-security? Inline > | signatures? > | > > ws-security is still emerging and general. I think we would need to have a > section customizing some parts of it similar to the one we wrote for SAML. > Hopefully this section would become more and more thinner as the > ws-security/SOAP security evolves. On a related note ETSI has a good > document adding stuff to XML Signature like key information, time stamping > authority et al which we might want to look at. > > Another quick question : What do we do for encryption ? Again WS-Security ? > > cheers and have a happy thanksgiving -- ____________________________________________________________ Stephen Farrell Baltimore Technologies, tel: (direct line) +353 1 881 6716 39 Parkgate Street, fax: +353 1 881 7000 Dublin 8. mailto:stephen.farrell@baltimore.ie Ireland http://www.baltimore.com
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 13:04:12 UTC